Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, GH Lariboisiere-Fernand Widal, Paris, France

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the vastus intermedius nerve can be blocked by using surface coordinates and to measure the effects of selective nerve block on quadriceps spasticity and immediate gait.

DESIGN: Case series.

SETTING: Physical medicine and rehabilitation department of a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS: Twelve patients with hemiplegia disabled by quadriceps overactivity.

INTERVENTION: Anesthesic block of the vastus intermedius by using surface coordinates, femoral nerve stimulation before and after block, and surface electrodes recording of the amplitude of the maximum direct motor response of each head of the quadriceps.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of spasticity, voluntary knee extension velocity, speed of gait, and knee flexion when walking.

RESULTS: To be effective, the puncture point (.29 of thigh length and 2cm lateral) had to be slightly modified to 1cm laterally from a point situated at 0.2 of the thigh length. A selective block of the vastus intermedius could not be achieved, but a block of the vastus lateralis was always achieved, twice associated with a block of the vastus intermedius, resulting in decreased quadriceps spasticity, no changes in gait parameters, no decrease in voluntary knee extension velocity, and subjective improvement in gait for 3 patients.

CONCLUSION: Selective block of the vastus lateralis with or without the vastus intermedius can be achieved by using surface coordinates without any dramatic effect on knee extension velocity, and it could be useful for phenol or alcohol block or surgical neurotomy. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Publication Types:
Clinical Trial

PMID: 11994809 - www.pubmed.com

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France. x-capdevilla@chu-montpellier.fr

Continuous three-in-one block is widely used for postoperative analgesia after proximal lower limb surgery, but location of the catheter has not been well addressed in the literature. We prospectively studied, in 100 patients, the characteristics of catheter threading under the iliac fascia and the correlations between catheter tip location and effective sensory and motor blockade of the three principal nerves of the lumbar plexus. Postoperatively, in conscious patients, 16 to 20 cm of a catheter was placed in the fascial sheath after femoral nerve location with a nerve stimulator. Contrast media (3 mL Iopamidol 390) was injected, and the catheter tip was located by means of an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. An equal-volume mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine/2% lidocaine with epinephrine (30 mL) was injected through the catheter. Patient and catheter-insertion characteristics were noted. Thirty minutes after injection, sensory blockade was evaluated in the cutaneous territories of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral, and obturator nerves, along with motor blockade of the last two nerves. Pain scores at 30 min were also recorded. Seven block failures were noted. The tip of the catheter reached the lumbar plexus (Group 1) in 23% of the patients and lay deep to the medial (Group 2) or lateral (Group 3) part of the fascia iliaca in 33% and 37% of the patients, respectively. Demographic data and catheter threading characteristics were comparable among the groups. A three-in-one block was noted in 91% of Group 1 patients, but in only 52% and 27% of Group 2 and 3 patients, respectively (P < 0.05). Comparing Group 2 and 3 patients, sensory block was achieved in respectively 100% and 94% for the femoral nerve, 52% and 94% for the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (P < 0.05), and 82% and 27% for the obturator nerve (P < 0.05). Visual analog scale pain scores on movement were significantly lower in Group 1 patients (P < 0.05). We conclude that during a continuous three-in-one block, the threaded catheter rarely reached the lumbar plexus. The quality of sensory and motor blockade and initial pain relief depend on the location of the catheter tip under the fascia iliaca. IMPLICATIONS: The course of a continuous three-in-one block catheter is unpredictable. Only 23% of the catheters lie near the lumbar plexus. The success of sensory and motor blocks, as well as postoperative analgesia, depend on the position of the catheter under the fascia iliaca.

PMID: 11916812 - www.pubmed.com

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hopital Central, Nancy, France. h.bouaziz@chu-nancy.fr

In 1973, Winnie et al. introduced the inguinal paravascular three-in-one block, which allegedly provides anesthesia of three nerves--the femoral, lateral cutaneous femoral, and obturator nerves--with a single injection. This concept was undisputed until the success of the obturator nerve block was reassessed by using evidence of adductor weakness rather than cutaneous sensory blockade, the latter being variable in its distribution and often absent. We performed this study, therefore, to evaluate the area of sensory loss produced by direct injection of local anesthetic around the obturator nerve. A selective obturator nerve block with 7 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine was performed in 30 patients scheduled for knee surgery. Sensory deficit and adductor strength were evaluated for 30 min by using sensory tests (cold and light-touch perception) and the pressure generated by the patient's squeezing a blood pressure cuff placed between the knees. Subsequently, a three-in-one block was performed, and the sensory deficit was reassessed. The obturator nerve block was successful in 100% of cases. The strength of adductors decreased by 77% 17% (mean SD). In 17 patients (57%), there was no cutaneous contribution of the obturator nerve. The remaining 7 patients (23%) had an area of hypoesthesia (cold sensation was blunt but still present) on the superior part of the popliteal fossa, and the other 6 (20%) had sensory deficit located at the medial aspect of the thigh. The three-in-one block resulted in blockade of the lateral aspect of the thigh in 87% of cases, whereas the anteromedial aspect was always anesthetized. By use of magnetic resonance imaging in eight volunteers, we demonstrated that the obturator nerve has already divided into its two branches at the site of local anesthetic injection. However, the injection of blue dye after having simulated the technique in five cadavers showed that the fluid regularly spread to both branches. We conclude that after three-in-one block, a femoral nerve block may have been assessed as an obturator nerve block in 100% of cases when testing the cutaneous distribution of the obturator nerve on the medial aspect of the thigh. IMPLICATIONS: Previous studies reporting an incidence of obturator nerve block after three-in-one block may have mistaken a femoral nerve block for an obturator nerve block in 100% of cases when the cutaneous distribution of the obturator nerve was assessed on the medial aspect of the thigh. The only way to effectively evaluate obturator nerve function is to assess adductor strength.

PMID: 11812716 - www.pubmed.com

Department of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The sensory innervation of the hip joint includes the sensory articular branches of the obturator and femoral nerves. In this report, we retrospectively evaluated 14 cases in which hip joint pain was treated by percutaneous radiofrequency lesioning of sensory branches of obturator and/or femoral nerves. METHODS: Fourteen patients who had hip joint pain and underwent percutaneous radiofrequency lesioning of sensory branches of obturator and/or femoral nerves were studied. In all cases, intra-articular hip joint block or articular branch block of obturator nerve with local anesthesia was transiently effective. Radiofrequency lesioning was performed at 75 degrees C to 80 degrees C for 90 seconds using an RFG-3B generator and Sluijter-Mehta cannulae kit (Radionics, Burlington, MA) for the obturator nerve in 9 patients and for both the obturator and femoral nerves in 5 patients. To assess pain intensity, a visual analog scale (VAS) was used. RESULTS: The VAS scores before and after the radiofrequency lesioning were 6.8 0.9 and 2.7 1.3, respectively. Twelve patients (86%) reported at least 50% relief of pain for 1 to 11 months. There were no side effects or motor weakness observed. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous radiofrequency lesioning of sensory branches of the obturator and femoral nerves is an alternative treatment in patients with hip joint pain, especially in those where operation is not applicable.

PMID: 11707799 - www.pubmed.com

We investigated the incidence of bacterial and vascular or neurological complications resulting from femoral nerve catheters used for postoperative analgesia. Patients requiring continuous femoral blockade were consecutively included. Using surgical aseptic procedure, 211 femoral nerve catheters were placed (short-beveled insulated needle, peripheral nerve stimulator). After 48 h, each catheter was removed and semiquantitative bacteriological cultures were performed on each distal catheter tip. Postoperative analgesia and antibiotics were standardized. All complications during the insertion of the catheters and postoperatively (after 48 h and 6 wk) were noted. Few initial complications with no immediate or delayed complications were noted (20 difficult insertions, 3 impossible injections, 3 ineffective catheters, and 12 vascular punctures). After 48 h, 208 catheters were analyzed; 57% had positive bacterial colonization (with a single organism in 53%). The most frequent organisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis (71%), Enterococcus (10%), and Klebsiella (4%). Neither cellulitis nor abscess occurred. Three transitory bacteremias likely related to the catheter occurred. After 6 wk, no septic complications were noted. One femoral paresthesia, partially recovered 1 yr later, was noted. We conclude that the risk of bacterial complications is small with femoral nerve catheters, although the rate of colonization is frequent. IMPLICATIONS: In this prospective study, continuous femoral nerve catheters were effective for postoperative analgesia but had a frequent rate of bacterial catheter colonization. We found no serious infections after short-term (2-day) infusion. Side effects were few, but one nerve injury occurred.

Publication Types:
Clinical Trial

PMID: 11574381 - www.pubmed.com

We compared the effects of using a single- or multiple-injection technique on the volume of 0.5% ropivacaine required to block the femoral nerve, in a prospective, randomized, blinded fashion in which 50 premedicated patients received a femoral nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine by use of a nerve stimulator and either a single- (n = 25) or multiple- (n = 25) injection technique. Muscular twitches were elicited at < or =0.5 mA before anesthetic injection. The designated volume of local anesthetic was equally divided among contraction of the vastus medialis, vastus intermedius, and vastus lateralis for the multiple injections, or it was injected at the contraction of the vastus intermedius with motion of the patella for the single injection. The local anesthetic volumes were varied for consecutive patients by using an up-and-down staircase method; a blinded observer determined the adequacy of nerve blockade (loss of pinprick sensation in the medial, patellar, and lateral portions of the knee, with concomitant block of the quadriceps muscle) 20 min after injection. The mean (95% confidence interval) volume required for blocking the femoral nerve with the multiple-injection technique (14 [12-16] mL) was significantly smaller than that observed with the single injection (23 [20-26] mL) (P = 0.001). According to logistic regression analyses, the 95% effective volumes of ropivacaine required to block the femoral nerve within 20 min after injection were 29 and 21 mL with a single or multiple injection, respectively. We conclude that searching for multiple muscular twitches reduces the volume of 0.5% ropivacaine required to produce blockade of the femoral nerve. Implications: We evaluated the effects of using a single- or multiple-injection technique on the volume of 0.5% ropivacaine required to block the femoral nerve. The 95%effective concentration values for producing the same degree of sensory and motor blockade of the femoral nerve within 20 min after injection were 29 mL after elicitation of a patella twitch and 21 mL when the three main branches of the femoral nerve were identified, potentially leading to an important benefit for patients receiving peripheral nerve blocks.

Publication Types:
Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comment in:
Anesth Analg. 2002 Feb;94(2):475-6.

PMID: 11429362 - www.pubmed.com

The three-in-one technique of simultaneously blocking the femoral, the lateral femoral cutaneous (LFC), and the obturator nerves by a single injection of a local anesthetic was first described in 1973, and it was suggested that the underlying mechanism was one of cephalad spread resulting in a blockade of the lumbar plexus. Today, the technique is widely used in surgery and pain management of the lower limb. Many investigators have, however, reported suboptimal analgesia levels, particularly in the obturator nerve. The purpose of this prospective study was to trace the distribution of a local anesthetic during a three-in-one block by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Seven patients scheduled for surgery of the lower limb were analyzed with the aid of a primary MRI and then received three-in-one blocks using 30 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% under the guidance of a nerve stimulator. A secondary MRI was performed to determine the distribution pattern of the local anesthetic. It emerged that the local anesthetic blocks the femoral nerve directly, the LFC nerve through lateral spread, and the anterior branch of the obturator nerve by slightly spreading in a medial direction. No involvement of the proximal and posterior portions of the obturator nerve was observed, nor was there any cephalad spread that could have resulted in a lumbar plexus blockade. We therefore conclude that the basis of the three-in-one block is confined to lateral, medial, and caudal spread of the local anesthetic, which effectively blocks the femoral and LFC nerves, as well as the distal anterior branch of the obturator nerve. IMPLICATIONS: We demonstrate by using magnetic resonance imaging that the mechanism of a three-in-one block is one of lateral, caudal, and slight medial spread of a local anesthetic with subsequent blockade of the femoral, the lateral femoral cutaneous, and the anterior branch of the obturator nerves. It does not involve cephalad spread of the local anesthetic with blockade of the lumbar plexus.

Publication Types:
Clinical trial

Comments:
Comment in: Anesth Analg 2000 Jan;90(1):1-2

PMID: 10624991, UI: 20088329 - www.pubmed.com

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the addition of a preincisional femoral 3-in-1 block to intra-articular instillation with ropivacaine 0.2% at the end of surgery improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) under general anesthesia. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, we studied 44 patients scheduled for inpatient ACLR. Prior to incision, the treatment group (n = 22) received a femoral 3-in-1 block with 40 ml ropivacaine 0.2%, augmented by infiltrations of the lateral and anteromedial incisions with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.2% at the end of the procedure. The control group (n = 22) received saline 0.9% instead of ropivacaine. All patients received an intra-articular instillation with 30 ml ropivacaine 0.2% at the end of surgery. The primary efficacy variable was 24 hr morphine consumption postoperatively standardized by weight, administered intravenously via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. RESULTS: There was no difference between both groups in 24 hr PCA morphine consumption postoperatively (control, 0.45 +/- 0.44 [mean +/- SD] mg x kg(-1); treatment, 0.37 +/- 0.50 mg x kg(-1); p = 0.55). No difference was found in postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, adverse events, or vital signs. In the treatment group, R = 10/22 patients did not require postoperative morphine compared with R = 6/22 in the control group (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: We found no effect of a femoral 3-in-1 block with ropivacaine 0.2% on postoperative analgesic consumption, compared to intra-articular instillation with ropivacaine 0.2% alone, in patients undergoing ACLR under general anesthesia.

Publication Types:
Clinical trial
Randomized controlled trial
PMID: 10451133, UI: 99378342 - www.pubmed.com

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the spread and quality of sensitive blockade produced by continuous and prolonged use of a femoral catheter inserted for postoperative analgesia. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective non comparative evaluation. PATIENTS: The study included 20 consecutive patients undergoing major knee surgery with postoperative analgesia obtained with a femoral catheter, a technique commonly used in our department. METHODS: Regional analgesia was induced after surgery with a bolus injection of 30 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine 1 in 200,000, maintained by continuous infusion of 1% lidocaine + morphine 0.03 mg.mL-1 + clonidine 2 micrograms.mL-1 for 48 h. The infusion rate was 0.1 mL.kg-1.h-1. The evaluation was based on: 1) the quality of analgesia at rest, at 30 min, h1, h3, h6, h12, h24 and h48; 2) the sensitive and motor blockade at the same time intervals. RESULTS: A "3 in 1" block was only observed in 50% of patients after the initial bolus via the femoral catheter. During the maintenance of analgesia with a continuous infusion a blockade of the three main nerves of the lumbar plexus occurred in less than 20% of patients after 6 h and was limited to the territory of the femoral nerve in 45 to 50% of patients after 12 to 48 h. In all cases the median values of VAS were below 42 mm. CONCLUSION: In most patients, a local anaesthetic administered continuously via a femoral catheter produces a blockade limited to the femoral nerve. These data do not substantiate the conclusions by those who consider they are producing a continuous "3 in 1" block with this technique. However, it is obviously not essential to produce a sensitive blockade of the three main nerves of the lumbar plexus to obtain an effective analgesia after knee surgery.

Publication Types:
Clinical trial

PMID: 9881187, UI: 99097862 - www.pubmed.com

We tested the effectiveness of bilateral continuous paravascular femoral nerve blocks in a patient following bilateral femoral shaft surgery in whom other analgesic regimens were considered contraindicated or of limited effectiveness. Bilateral continuous femoral paravascular nerve blocks were performed using a previously described technique. General anesthesia was subsequently used to facilitate surgery, which was a bilateral osteosynthesis using dynamic hip screws for osteolytic metastases of the proximal extremities of both femurs. A continuous infusion of lidocaine, morphine, and clonidine was established in both femoral catheters preoperatively and used postoperatively as the principle source of analgesia. Radiographic contrast was used to document the position of both catheters and to document the spread of injectate. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded in the recovery room and at 4, 16, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Plasma lidocaine levels were determined by gas chromatography at 4, 16, and 48 hours postoperatively. Sensory assessment in the distribution of the femoral, lateral cutaneous, and obturator nerves was performed to confirm the presence of sensory blockade. We successfully provided analgesia with bilateral continuous femoral paravascular nerve blocks. Pain scores at rest were consistently rated good to excellent (VAS < 20 mm). Evidence of sensory conduction block was present throughout the infusion. Plasma concentrations of lidocaine were consistently below toxic levels (1.35 to 1.65 micrograms/ml). Radiographic contrast studies failed to demonstrate movement of contrast to the level of the lumbar plexus. Bilateral continuous femoral paravascular nerve blocks can be used to provide effective and safe analgesia in patients requiring aggressive analgesia in whom other techniques may be contraindicated.

PMID: 9805704, UI: 99022546 - www.pubmed.com

HYPOTHESIS AND OBJECTIVES: Trunk blockades in arthroscopic knee surgery are rarely performed because combined blockade of the sciatic and lumbar plexus nerves are required, particularly if ischemia is required. We aimed to assess the efficacy of the "3-in-1 block" combined with intraarticular infiltration of local anesthetic for arthroscopic meniscectomy. The results were compared with our standard technique, subarachnoid anesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty ASA I-II patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy without ischemia. The patients were randomly assigned to receive "3-in-1 block" with 40 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine (T group, n = 20), or the standard technique of subarachnoid puncture with 3 mL of 2% lidocaine (S group, n = 20). Twenty minutes after puncture patients in both groups received intraarticular injections of 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% with 1:200,000 adrenaline in the knee. Surgery began 10 minutes later. We assessed requirements for sedation during surgery, degree of satisfaction during surgery according to the surgeon and the patient, hemodynamic variables at predetermined times, postoperative pain (on a verbal scale and related to consumption of analgesics in the first 48 hours after surgery), and the appearance of side effects attributable to anesthetic technique. RESULTS: Demographic variables were comparable in the two groups and no surgical events were recorded. Eighteen patients in the T group and one in the S group required sedation during surgery (p < 0.05). Blood pressure was significantly lower in the S group than in the T group (p < 0.05). No patient in the T group required atropine and/or ephedrine during surgery, whereas 5 patients in the S group did (p < 0.05). Postoperative evolution was similar in the two groups. No postoperative complications attributable to the techniques were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The "3-in-1 block" combined with joint infiltration of local anesthetics may be an effective alternative when subarachnoid anesthesia is contraindicated in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy.

Publication Types:
Clinical trial
Randomized controlled trial

PMID: 9780763, UI: 98454048 - www.pubmed.com

The 3-in-1 (Group 1) and fascia iliaca compartment (Group 2) blocks, two single-injection, anterior approach procedures used to simultaneously block the femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous (LFC) nerves, were compared in 100 adults after lower limb surgery. Pain control, sensory and motor blockades, and radiographically visualized spread of local anesthetic solution were studied prospectively. Both approaches provided efficient pain control using 30 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine and 5 mL of contrast media (iopamidol). Complete lumbar plexus blockade was achieved in 18 (38%) Group 1 and 17 (34%) Group 2 patients (n = 50 patients per group). Sensory block of the femoral, obturator, genitofemoral, and LFC nerves was obtained in 90% and 88%, 52% and 38%, 38% and 34%, and 62% and 90% of the patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05). Sensory LFC blockade was obtained more rapidly for the patients in Group 2 (P < 0.05). Concurrent internal and external spread of the local anesthetic solution under the fascia iliaca and between the iliacus and psoas muscles was noted in 62 of the 92 block procedures analyzed radiographically. Isolated external spreads under the fascia iliaca and over the iliacus muscle were noted in 10% and 36% of the patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05). The local anesthetic solution reached the lumbar plexus in only five radiographs. We conclude that the fascia iliaca compartment block is more effective than the 3-in-1 block in producing simultaneous blockade of the LFC and femoral nerves in adults. After both procedures, blockade was obtained primarily by the spread of local anesthetic under the fascia iliaca and only rarely by contact with the lumbar plexus. Implications: In adults, the two anterior approaches, 3-in-1 and fascia iliaca compartment blocks, provide effective postoperative analgesia. The fascia iliaca compartment technique provides faster and more consistent simultaneous blockade of the lateral femoral cutaneous and femoral nerves. Sensory block is caused by the spread of local anesthetic solution under the fascia iliaca and only rarely to the lumbar plexus.

PMID: 9585293, UI: 98244692 - www.pubmed.com